<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memo Prompts a Fresno Medical Marijuana Dispensary to Re-Open</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingbroker.com/memo-prompts-a-fresno-medical-marijuana-dispensary-to-re-open/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingbroker.com/memo-prompts-a-fresno-medical-marijuana-dispensary-to-re-open/</link>
	<description>Fresno California Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:51:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gilmore</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingbroker.com/memo-prompts-a-fresno-medical-marijuana-dispensary-to-re-open/comment-page-1/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gilmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingbroker.com/?p=518#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Greetings people of Fresno;

Reading the 10/19/09 article, &quot;Memo Prompts a Fresno Medical Marijuana Dispensary to Re-Open&quot;, left me asking myself why would educated city leader(s) and a presumably informed and impartial judge choose to ban medical marijuana dispensaries in their geographic area of influence/jurisdiction?  Did our revered democratic process not indicate the will of the majority? If one reasons potential conflict-of-interest as motivation behind the ban, one might borrow from the Greek and, &quot;Follow the money.&quot; To accuse any cities leaders of corruption is, in 2009, to stereotype. To accuse a judge of monetary corruption, is an entirely different matter, not to be done without solid evidence.  In looking to the root of a judge(s) ruling, without aforementioned solid evidence one may be left questioning the involvement of ego. To admit the validity of marijuana as a therapeutic agent, is to question the ethics of past rulings.
Food for thought, ask a friend or a person suffering from illness you may happen to know, what they think on this issue.
I wish all of the readers of this post a life free of unnecessary pain, despair and suffering!

Sincerely,
a native son with tourette syndrome,

Aaron Gilmore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings people of Fresno;</p>
<p>Reading the 10/19/09 article, &#8220;Memo Prompts a Fresno Medical Marijuana Dispensary to Re-Open&#8221;, left me asking myself why would educated city leader(s) and a presumably informed and impartial judge choose to ban medical marijuana dispensaries in their geographic area of influence/jurisdiction?  Did our revered democratic process not indicate the will of the majority? If one reasons potential conflict-of-interest as motivation behind the ban, one might borrow from the Greek and, &#8220;Follow the money.&#8221; To accuse any cities leaders of corruption is, in 2009, to stereotype. To accuse a judge of monetary corruption, is an entirely different matter, not to be done without solid evidence.  In looking to the root of a judge(s) ruling, without aforementioned solid evidence one may be left questioning the involvement of ego. To admit the validity of marijuana as a therapeutic agent, is to question the ethics of past rulings.<br />
Food for thought, ask a friend or a person suffering from illness you may happen to know, what they think on this issue.<br />
I wish all of the readers of this post a life free of unnecessary pain, despair and suffering!</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
a native son with tourette syndrome,</p>
<p>Aaron Gilmore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
